Ukrainian Journal of Physical Optics 

Number  3, Volume 7,  2006

Home page
 
 

Other articles 
in this issue


Comment on “Effective Refractive Index Tensor for Weak-Field Gravity” by P. Boonserm, C. Cattoen, T. Faber, M. Visser and S. Weinfurtner
Vlokh R.O., Kostyrko M.E.

Institute of Physical Optics, 23 Dragomanov St., 79005 Lviv, Ukraine

download full version

P. Boonserm et. al have tried to describe some anisotropic optical effects in the gravitation field in frame of the general relativity and by introducing the so-called “effective refractive index tensor” similarly to anisotropic crystals. We suppose that this approach is inconsequent because of the following: if one develops this claim, it would be necessary to attribute the gravitation field to the properties of matter, including its electric properties, the refractive index is not a tensorial quantity and the analogy to the situation in anisotropic crystals does not lead to artificial “effective refractive index tensor” but to naturally introduced tensor of optical-frequency dielectric impermeability of matter.

Key words: weak-field gravity, refractive index

PACS: 04.20.-q, 78.20.Ci

doi 10.3116/16091833/7/3/147/2006

1. Boonserm P, Cattoen C, Faber T, Visser M and Weinfurtner S, 2005. Class.Quant.Grav. 22: 1905.
        doi:10.1088/0264-9381/22/11/001  http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/22/11/001
2. Schneider P, Ehlers J and Falco EE, 1993. Gravitational Lenses (Berlin: Springer).
3. Mollerach S and Roulet E, 2002. Gravitational Lensing and Microlensing (Singapore: World Scientific).
4. Nandi KK and Islam A, 1995. Am.J.Phys. 63: 251.
        doi:10.1119/1.17934  http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.17934
5. Evans J, Nandi KK and Islam A, 1996. Gen.Rel.Grav. 28: 413.
        doi:10.1007/BF02105085  http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02105085
6. Fernando de Felice, 1971. Gen.Rel.Grav. 2: 347.
        doi:10.1007/BF00758153  http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00758153
7. Evans JC, Alsing PM, Giorgetti S and Nandi KK, 2001. Am.J.Phys. 69: 1103.
        doi:10.1119/1.1389281  http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1389281
8. Nye JF, 2000 Physical Properties of Crystals: Their Representation by Tensors and Matrices (New York: Oxford University Press).
9. Puthoff HE, 2002. Found.Phys. 32: 927.
        doi:10.1023/A:1016011413407  http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1016011413407
10. Vlokh R, 2004. Ukr.J.Phys.Opt. 5: 27.
        doi:10.3116/16091833/5/1/27/2004  http://dx.doi.org/10.3116/16091833/5/1/27/2004
11. Vlokh R and Kostyrko M, 2005. Ukr.J.Phys.Opt. 6: 125.
        doi:10.3116/16091833/6/4/125/2005  http://dx.doi.org/10.3116/16091833/6/4/125/2005

Home | Instructions to Authors | Editorial Board | Meetings & Exhibitions