Ukrainian Journal of Physical Optics 

Number  1, Volume 3,  2002

Home page
 
 

Other articles 
in this issue
Comments on the Shoucri’s interpretation of the contour integral in diffraction theory. (On the bicentenary of Th.Young's diffraction paradigm)  
1Polyanskii P.V., 2Botiryova G.V.

1Chernivtsy National University, 2 Kotsyubinsky Str., Chernivtsy 85012, Ukraine
2Institute of Physics, Ukrainian National Academy of Sciences, 44 Prospect Nauky, Kyiv 03039, Ukraine

download full version

The Shoucri's interpretation of the contour integral arising within the framework of the Young-Rubinowicz model of diffraction phenomena is considered. Crucial hypothetical experiment intended to prove the Shoucri’s interpretation is discussed. It is shown that the initial Young's idea on the nature of diffraction formalized by Rubinowicz possesses undoubted advantages in respect to the Shoucri's interpretation is being undergone the direct experimental verification.

doi 10.3116/16091833/3/1/61/2002
References:
1. Feynman RP, Liighton RB, Sands M, 1963. The Feynman lectures of physics, 1 Adisson-Wesley.
2. Born M, Wolf E, 1968. Principles of optics Pergamon Press.
3. Goodman JW, 1968. Introduction to Fourier optics McGraw-Hill.
4. Rubinowicz A, 1917. Ann. der Physik 53: 257-278.
5. Sommerfeld A, 1954. Optics Academic Press.
6. Malyuzhinyets GD, 1959. Usp.Fiz.Nauk 69: 321-334.
7. Honl H, Maue AW, Westpfahl K, 1961. Theorie of Beugung. Springer.
8. Langlois P, Boivion A, 1985. Can.J.Phys. 63: 265-274.
9. Miyamoto K, Wolf E, 1962. J Opt.Soc.Amer. 52: 615-637.
10. Marchand EW, Wolf E, 1962. J Opt.Soc.Amer. 52: 761-767.
11. Rubmowicz A, 1957. Nature 180: 160-162.
        doi:10.1038/180160a0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/180160a0
12. Bogatiryova GV, 2000. Properties of Young holograms PhD Thesis, Chenivtsi, 207.
13. Khizhnyak AI, Anokhov SP, Lymarenko RA, Soskin MS, Vasnetsov MV, 2000. J.Opt. Soc. Amer. A 17: 2199-2207.
14. Polyanskii PV, Bogatiryova GV, 2001. Proc. SPIE 4607: 9.
15. Shoucri RM, 1969. J.Opt.Soc.Amer. 59: 1158-1162.
16. Shoucri RM, 2000. Can.J.Phys. 78: 1-6.
        doi:10.1139/cjp-78-5-6-561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjp-78-5-6-561
17. Landsberg GS, 1995. Augustm Frensel (Outline of life and creative work) In: Frensel A. Selected papers in optics, GITTL, Moscow 7-69 572.
18. Mulak G, 1993. Proc. SPIE 1991: 7-16.
        doi:10.1117/12.192015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.192015
19. Langlois P, Cormier M, Beaulieu R, Blanchard M, 1977. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 67: 87-92.
20. Frensel A, 1826. Mem De l’Acad. 5: 365
21. Bogatiryova GV, Polyanskii PV, 1999. Proc. SPIE 3904: 240-255.
        doi:10.1117/12.370407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.370407
22. Anokhov SP, Lymarenko RA, Khizhnyak AI, 2001. Ukr. Phys. J. 46: 298-302.
23. Fok VA, 1970. Problems of diffraction and propagation of electromagnetic waves. Sov. Rad.
24. Vaganov RB, Katsenelenbaum BZ, 1982. Principles of diffraction theory. Nauka.
25. Suzuki T, 1962. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 61: 439-445
26. Polyanskii PV, Polyanskaya GV, 1997. Journ. Opt. Technol. 64: 52-63.
27. Polyanskaya GV, 1997. Proc SPIE 3317: 251-260.
        doi:10.1117/12.295690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.295690
28. Smirnov AN, Strokovskii SA, 1994. Optics and Spectroscopy 76: 1019-1026

Home | Instructions to Authors | Editorial Board | Meetings & Exhibitions